Foxit Advanced PDF Editor V4.1.5 Incl Crack

Foxit Advanced PDF Editor V4.1.5 Incl Crack

Download File ->>->>->> https://urlgoal.com/2tqatC

New form field support includes barcode, date, and image form fields. Support for using an external JavaScript editor, as well as JavaScript functions for page numbering/transitions, search/indexing, web links, and more.

Improved Web Browser PDF Conversion PluginThe improved PDF conversion plugins to IE, Firefox and Chrome provide more advanced options to convert webpages to PDF, including settings for login, timeout, hyperlinks, and more.

A Local File Inclusion vulnerability in the Site Editor plugin through 1.1.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to retrieve arbitrary files via the ajax_path parameter to editor/extensions/pagebuilder/includes/ajax_shortcode_pattern.php, aka absolute path traversal.

Search CVE List Downloads Data Feeds Update a CVE Record Request CVE IDs TOTAL CVE Records: 194928 NOTICE: Transition to the all-new CVE website at WWW.CVE.ORG and CVE Record Format JSON are underway.NOTICE: Changes are coming to CVE List Content Downloads in 2023. .alignright {text-align: right;font-size: x-small;} Home > CVE > Search Results Search ResultsThere are 949 CVE Records that match your search.NameDescriptionCVE-2023-22875IBM QRadar SIEM 7.4 and 7.5copies certificate key files used for SSL/TLS in the QRadar web user interface to managed hosts in the deployment that do not require that key. IBM X-Force ID: 244356.CVE-2022-46393An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.2 and 3.x before 3.3.0. There is a potential heap-based buffer overflow and heap-based buffer over-read in DTLS if MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID is enabled and MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_IN_LEN_MAX > 2 * MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX.CVE-2022-46392An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.2 and 3.x before 3.3.0. An adversary with access to precise enough information about memory accesses (typically, an untrusted operating system attacking a secure enclave) can recover an RSA private key after observing the victim performing a single private-key operation, if the window size (MBEDTLS_MPI_WINDOW_SIZE) used for the exponentiation is 3 or smaller.CVE-2022-46174efs-utils is a set of Utilities for Amazon Elastic File System (EFS). A potential race condition issue exists within the Amazon EFS mount helper in efs-utils versions v1.34.3 and below. When using TLS to mount file systems, the mount helper allocates a local port for stunnel to receive NFS connections prior to applying the TLS tunnel. In affected versions, concurrent mount operations can allocate the same local port, leading to either failed mount operations or an inappropriate mapping from an EFS customer&#8217;s local mount points to that customer&#8217;s EFS file systems. This issue is patched in version v1.34.4. There is no recommended work around. We recommend affected users update the installed version of efs-utils to v1.34.4 or later.CVE-2022-46153Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. In affected versions there is a potential vulnerability in Traefik managing TLS connections. A router configured with a not well-formatted TLSOption is exposed with an empty TLSOption. For instance, a route secured using an mTLS connection set with a wrong CA file is exposed without verifying the client certificates. Users are advised to upgrade to version 2.9.6. Users unable to upgrade should check their logs to detect the error messages and fix your TLS options.CVE-2022-45419If the user added a security exception for an invalid TLS certificate, opened an ongoing TLS connection with a server that used that certificate, and then deleted the exception, Firefox would have kept the connection alive, making it seem like the certificate was still trusted. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 107.CVE-2022-45391Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin 4.8.0.143 and earlier globally and unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for the entire Jenkins controller JVM.CVE-2022-45044A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 devices (CPU variant CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 devices (CPU variant CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 devices (CPU variant CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 devices (CPU variant CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 devices (CPU variant CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 devices (CPU variant CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 devices (CPU variant CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 devices (CPU variant CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 devices (CPU variant CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 devices (CPU variant CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 devices (CPU variant CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 devices (CPU variant CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 devices (CPU variant CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 devices (CPU variant CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 devices (CPU variant CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 devices (CPU variant CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 devices (CPU variant CP050) (All versions). Affected devices do not properly restrict secure client-initiated renegotiations within the SSL and TLS protocols. This could allow an attacker to create a denial of service condition on the ports 443/tcp and 4443/tcp for the duration of the attack.CVE-2022-43974MatrixSSL 4.0.4 through 4.5.1 has an integer overflow in matrixSslDecodeTls13. A remote attacker might be able to send a crafted TLS Message to cause a buffer overflow and achieve remote code execution. This is fixed in 4.6.0.CVE-2022-42961An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. A fault injection attack on RAM via Rowhammer leads to ECDSA key disclosure. Users performing signing operations with private ECC keys, such as in server-side TLS connections, might leak faulty ECC signatures. These signatures can be processed via an advanced technique for ECDSA key recovery. (In 5.5.0 and later, WOLFSSL_CHECK_SIG_FAULTS can be used to address the vulnerability.)CVE-2022-42905In wolfSSL before 5.5.2, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS 1.3 client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes. (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging.)CVE-2022-41316HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise&#8217;s TLS certificate auth method did not initially load the optionally configured CRL issued by the role's CA into memory on startup, resulting in the revocation list not being checked if the CRL has not yet been retrieved. Fixed in 1.12.0, 1.11.4, 1.10.7, and 1.9.10.CVE-2022-4087A vulnerability was found in iPXE. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function tls_new_ciphertext of the file src/net/tls.c of the component TLS. The manipulation of the argument pad_len leads to information exposure through discrepancy. The name of the patch is 186306d6199096b7a7c4b4574d4be8cdb8426729. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-214054 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.CVE-2022-40735The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows use of long exponents that arguably make certain calculations unnecessarily expensive, because the 1996 van Oorschot and Wiener paper found that \"(appropriately) short exponents\" can be used when there are adequate subgroup constraints, and these short exponents can lead to less expensive calculations than for long exponents. This issue is different from CVE-2002-20001 because